Two newly listed KEV flaws: patch GPUStack and IBM Aspera Faspex

CISA added two flaws to KEV on November 9, 2026. GPUStack names 2.2.0 as patched. IBM names Faspex 5.0.19 PL1.

Reader ratingRate this article

Loading reader rating…

Privacy-conscious voting uses a signed random browser identifier and a short-lived network hash; the rating tables contain no raw IP-address column.

Reader ratings require JavaScript; the article remains fully readable without it.

Two newly listed KEV flaws: patch GPUStack and IBM Aspera Faspex [1]

CISA added CVE-2026-102895 and CVE-2026-123218 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on November 9, 2026. [1]

Reporting cutoff: November 9, 2026 at 20:40 UTC.

Bottom line

Bottom line: GPUStack deployments below 2.2.0 and IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.19 need urgent review and vendor remediation. [2] [3]

What CISA changed

Both entries carry a CISA remediation due date of November 12, 2026. [1]

CISA marks forensic triage “Yes” for both entries and lists known ransomware campaign use as “Unknown.” [1]

GPUStack: unauthenticated administrative access

GPUStack describes an authentication bypass that can grant unauthenticated administrative access through trust in a loopback source or a client-supplied X-GPUStack-Real-IP value. [2]

The project says the bypass can permit user and model changes, persistent administrator API-key creation, secret disclosure and code execution through the named inference-backend endpoint. [2]

The advisory reports exploitation in the wild against a GPUStack 2.1.1 deployment. [2]

GPUStack rates the issue Critical at CVSS 3.1 score 9.8 with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. [2]

The affected range is GPUStack below 2.2.0, and version 2.2.0 is the first fixed release named by the advisory. [2]

IBM Aspera Faspex: authorization bypass with a source conflict

IBM says Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.19 can allow an authorized user to craft a message that bypasses user authorization and gains full administrative privileges. [3]

Authentication conflict: IBM’s prose describes an authorized user, while its published CVSS 3.1 vector says PR:N (no privileges required). [3] Treat the prerequisite as unresolved rather than choosing the more alarming interpretation.

IBM rates the Faspex issue Critical at CVSS 3.1 score 9.8. [3]

IBM’s fix is Aspera Faspex 5.0.19 PL1 and instructs administrators to validate the faspex-core container image as 5.0.19, build 1ce4b13, Fix Pack 1. [3]

Vendor-backed action list

  1. Check the affected ranges: GPUStack versions below 2.2.0 and Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.19 are affected. [2] [3]
  2. Use CISA’s triage references: CISA’s required action for both entries points readers to its Forensics Triage Requirements. [1]
  3. Remediate GPUStack: upgrade to GPUStack 2.2.0 or later. [2]
  4. Remediate Faspex: apply 5.0.19 PL1 and validate the faspex-core image as 5.0.19, build 1ce4b13, Fix Pack 1. [3]
  5. Use GPUStack’s interim workarounds while updating: require authentication for loopback requests with force_auth_localhost=true; prevent the gateway from making external traffic appear as loopback; strip client-supplied X-GPUStack-Real-IP at the edge; and keep the API off untrusted networks. [2]
  6. Verify against the vendor targets: GPUStack says to upgrade to 2.2.0 or later; IBM says to validate the faspex-core image as 5.0.19, build 1ce4b13, Fix Pack 1. [2] [3]

What remains unknown

  • CISA’s catalog does not identify a ransomware campaign for either entry; its field is “Unknown.” [1]
  • A frozen case-insensitive search found no “victim” or “victims” match in the three reviewed primary-source extracts; this is a bounded text-search result, not a universal finding about victim counts. [1] [2] [3]

Sources

  1. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog (accessed November 9, 2026).
  2. GPUStack advisory GHSA-gj9m-f8ph-pmhr (accessed November 9, 2026).
  3. IBM Security Bulletin 7295921 / IBM CNA record (accessed November 9, 2026).